成全在线观看免费完整的,成全影视大全免费追剧大全,成全视频高清免费播放电视剧好剧,成全在线观看免费完整,成全在线观看高清全集,成全动漫视频在线观看完整版动画

×

Open WeChat and scan the QR code
Subscribe to our WeChat public account

HOME Overview Professional Fields Industry Fields Professionals Global Network News Publications Join Us Contact Us Subscribe CN EN JP
HOME > News > Transactions and Cases > AllBright Client Wins China’s First Movie Ambush Marketing Case

AllBright Client Wins China’s First Movie Ambush Marketing Case

 2014-12-088923

AllBright’s client Yongxu Liangchen Co. won the second and final trials in its case against two movie production companies accused of ambush marketing to benefit from Yongxu Liangchen’s “Bixian” horror movie series. The final verdict in the case, which is the first ambush marketing case in China’s movie industry, is a milestone in the industry’s development because it has set boundaries which define unfair competition practices in this sector. 

In June 2014, Yongxu Liangchen sued the two companies producing “Bixian Jinghun 3” for unfair competition because the defendants had been marketing their movie “Bixian Jinghun 3” by confusing audiences with the third installment of Yongxu Liangchen’s “Bixian” series.  

Beijing No.3 Intermediate People’s Court on July 1 ruled that Yongxu Liangchen had won the case and ordered the defendants to compensate Yongxu Liangchen 500,000 RMB and make public apologies in the Beijing Evening News and on Sohu.com. The defendants immediately announced that they would lodge an appeal. 

In the written judgment of the second trial in the end of November, 2014, Beijing No.3 Intermediate People’s Court said that the facts were clearly ascertained, the laws were correctly applied and court proceedings were lawful in the first trial. So the appeal was hence rejected and the original judgment was upheld. 

In fact, the “Bixian Jinghun” production companies began their ambush marketing three years ago, when Yongxu Liangchen was about to release the first movie in the series in May, 2012. Yongxu Liangchen spent 15 million RMB to produce “Bixian”, whose director is famous South Korean horror movie director Byeong-ki Ahn. Ahn was well known for his successful horror movies, such as “Gawi” (2000) and “Phone” (2002).  
Shortly after Yongxu Liangchen announced that “Bixian” would première in July, suddenly “Bixian Jinghun” started its promotion and was scheduled to hit the big screens in June. “Bixian Jinghun” purposefully marketed itself by misleading audiences to believe that it was, or that it was related to, the movie “Bixian”. 

“Bixian” eventually became the best-selling horror movie in China in 2012, grossing 62 million RMB in box office revenue. “Bixian Jinghun”, whose budget was only 2 million RMB, also earned 23 million RMB.  

In 2013, Yongxu Liangchen produced “Bixian 2”, also directed by Ahn, with a 20 million RMB budget and earned 82 million RMB – it again became the most popular horror movie of the year.  

In 2014, when Yongxu Liangchen announced that the Ahn-directed “Bixian 3” would be released in July, the defendants launched another ambush marketing campaign by promoting “Bixian Jinghun 3” even though they had never produced “Bixian Jinghun 2”. After another misleading promotional campaign, “Bixian Jinghun 3” premièred on April 4 and earned 32 million RMB. 

The “Bixian” series is Yongxu Liangchen company’s core competence and should be protected by law. Any unethical attempt to gain advantages by using unfair competition tactics should be severely punished by law. 

The verdict in the first ambush marketing case has had far-reaching influence. Two months after the final verdict of the “Bixian” case was given, the Beijing High People’s Court ruled that Wuhan Huaqi Movies & TV Production, the production company of “Ren Zai Jiong Tu” (Lost on Journey), had won its case against the production company of “Ren Zai Jiong Tu Zhi Tai Jiong” (Lost in Thailand) for ambush marketing. The defendants were ordered to compensate 5 million RMB and make public apologies. It is apparent that Beijing’s courts have followed the precedent set by Yongxu Liangchen’s case, which is positive for the whole industry. 

欢迎光临: 翁源县| 衢州市| 项城市| 平昌县| 永昌县| 漳平市| 华蓥市| 习水县| 循化| 德化县| 崇左市| 宜春市| 游戏| 博白县| 曲沃县| 黄平县| 喀喇沁旗| 平罗县| 普陀区| 晴隆县| 清徐县| 鄂州市| 迭部县| 高淳县| 名山县| 阜新市| 延津县| 武定县| 芦溪县| 万源市| 广南县| 拜城县| 乌拉特后旗| 正宁县| 灵丘县| 东至县| 衡阳市| 武强县| 禹城市| 博爱县| 武城县|